Un-Fucking-Believable

This has to be the dumbest dumbass (or should I keep my cuss-o-meter up to par and say stupidest fuck nut) I have read in quite some time.
Re SCOTUS and the D.C. gun ban :

The Thugs Win the Case

[...]
Operating under the notion that it's better to beg forgiveness than to ask permission, our shooters long ago decided not to wait for the high court's thoughts on the matter. They simply arrogated to themselves the right to keep and bear arms and, with that right, license to shoot and kill, with impunity, whatever and whenever the evil spirits moved them.

Well, no shit. "If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns".

But wait! He offhandedly admits that fact himself:

The record will show that our home-grown shooters have blown through the city's so-called strict handgun ban like John Riggins going up the middle.

No shit. The responsible, law-abiding citizen wasn't able to have a gun, so guess who did?

...the dudes who have been blowing away their fellow citizens with abandon since the law was put on the books 32 years ago.

Yup. And now would-be targets of these fucks will have the ability to shoot back.

And to make sure that D.C. gun owners are free to fire their loaded handguns at will, the Supreme Court went one step further and killed the city's sensible requirement that weapons be equipped with trigger locks.

Yup. Will, Bob, Fred, ..., anyone who presents a threat.

Seriously though, 'fire at will'? There are still laws as well as common sense dictates which regulate when and when not to use a firearm fer chrissakes. What a stupid fuck.

The best part of this cumstain went running down the crack of his momma's ass.

He does make one valid statement:

So now it has come to pass that D.C. residents can keep handguns, as well as rifles and shotguns, in their homes. A well armed, informal militia we shall be -- ready to fire back in self-defense at the shooters who believed they had the right to their guns all along.

Exactly.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~