Outing gives Potter passages new meaningI don't really give a shit one way or the other. Rowling can do whatever the hell she want I suppose. Her life, her story, her money, whatever. But I don't see what the big deal is.
By HILLEL ITALIE, AP National Writer Sun Oct 21, 2:06 PM ET
NEW YORK - With author J.K. Rowling's revelation that master wizard Albus Dumbledore is gay, some passages about the Hogwarts headmaster and rival wizard Gellert Grindelwald have taken on a new and clearer meaning.
[...]
First of all, these are fucking made up characters in a fictional novel. Why the hubub, bub? Get a life.
Second, was turning a character into a cock-sucker really that important? Is it necessary to "make wonderful strides in tolerance toward homosexuality"? HELL NO! FAGGOTRY IS WRONG! Argue with me all you want, but if guys were meant for guys and girls were meant for girls, our physiques would have been designed differently!
So what exactly the hell was the advantage of making some dude out to be a fag? Did she need a boost in her already copious multi-bazillion dollar profits? Well, duh! Now everyone who has read a book or seen a movie is going to go back and read or watch the entire fucking story again, so they can now see it in a "different light" or what-the-fuck ever.
Praise Allah for capitalism! Democracy! Whiskey! Sexy!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment