What's Wrong With This Picture?

I posted this comment on another blog, responding to a post in reference to the eminent domain bullshit ruling by the great minds of the supreme court.

But I also wanted to put it out here.

Property is property, right?
Any personal posession is part of your property. Land, house, car, gun, ...

The constitution suffered another kick in the nuts in this case, and people are totally up in arms about it (including me). I have yet to hear of anyone 'for' this decision, except 5 supreme court morons, and the muffled roar of an indeterminate number of developers everywhere stifling moans whilst creaming their jeans.

Funny though, how a big chunk of the population thinks it's okay to step all over the second ammendment trying to take away other personal property which we have a right to own.

I guess it's all acceptable as long as it's for the good of the public.

Sounds like it's time to put a Ten Commandments plaque in the front yard, paint a flag on the roof, sit there with my guns and wait for 'the man' to come and take try to take my home.


Allah be praised.


Update: I wish him the best of luck:

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.
[. . .]
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."
[. . .]

Mouth; meet foot.